data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fda5c/fda5ce6462c56d48cd7ea054caabcf51a6050f66" alt=""
Seriously, while I'm sure that Daniel Craig is a fine actor, to call him "youthful" or "attractive" would be a stretch. That wouldn't be such a big deal except for the fact that he's supposed to be James frickin' Bond not Count Dracula. Oh, and did I mention that this is an origin story? If this is a young, spry James Bond at the beginning of his Double-0 career, what precisely will he look like as the veteran agent we've come to know and love? My guess is it'll take a few well-shaken (not stirred), vodka martinis before anyone will be able to recognize our favorite British Secret Agent.
1 comment:
Yeah, but George Lazenby was a pretty craggy lookin' fella too as I recall. Face like a bag of hammers, as my old Ma would say! I still reckon he was a top Bond, just a shame he didn't get more of a run at it...
Post a Comment